How the OFAC Delisting Petition Process Works

An OFAC administrative reconsideration request is a formal request to be removed from a sanctions list. Governed by 31 CFR § 501.807, it's a petition you submit to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to be removed from the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List or others.

This is your chance. The process allows a designated person or company to argue that their listing is no longer warranted or was a mistake from the start. It is a critical first step before—or even during—a lawsuit. But first, you must understand how to navigate the complex world of OFAC sanctions programs before you can challenge a designation.

Administrative Reconsideration - A formal process under U.S. law (31 CFR § 501.807) allowing a person or entity on an OFAC sanctions list to petition for their removal. The petitioner can argue that the original designation was flawed or that circumstances have changed, making the sanction no longer applicable.

Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) - A public list maintained by OFAC containing individuals, groups, and entities such as terrorists and narcotics traffickers whose assets are blocked and with whom U.S. persons are generally prohibited from dealing. For a listed person, this translates to a complete financial freeze-out, cutting them off from banking, business, and travel involving the U.S. dollar.

What is an Administrative Reconsideration Request?

An administrative reconsideration request is the main way a sanctioned party can directly petition the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) to be delisted. Its legal framework comes from 31 CFR § 501.807, a federal regulation that lays out the exact procedure for submitting such a petition.

The petition has two potential aims:

1. To argue that the original designation was based on a weak factual or legal basis.
2. To show that the circumstances which led to the designation have changed so dramatically that the sanction is now obsolete.

Is a delisting petition the same as administrative reconsideration?

Yes. The terms are interchangeable. "Delisting petition," "petition for administrative reconsideration," and "reconsideration request" all describe the same process under 31 CFR § 501.807. Even OFAC's own guidance uses the phrase "Filing a petition for removal from an OFAC list," so in practice, they all mean the same thing.

What Are the Grounds for Filing a Reconsideration Petition?

A successful petition can't be based on emotion. It must be built on specific legal arguments backed by solid evidence. The regulation itself points to two main grounds for requesting removal.

• Argument 1: Insufficient Basis for Designation: Here, you must provide evidence and legal arguments to show that OFAC’s original justification was wrong. Perhaps OFAC attributed to you conduct, positions or business ties that were not yours, or the legal reasoning was flawed when the listing was made. (If you are not on the list at all and a bank has simply matched your name to an SDN entry, that is a "false positive" resolved through the bank, if needed with OFAC's Compliance Hotline, not through a reconsideration petition.) This means directly attacking the administrative record OFAC used to sanction you in the first place.

• Argument 2: Change in Circumstances: You must prove the behavior that caused the sanction has stopped. Completely. This usually involves taking concrete remedial steps to guarantee future compliance and showing a clean, verifiable break from the activities that got you listed. A common example is proving you have severed all contact with a sanctioned group or that your company has sold off a problematic business division.

What remedial steps can be proposed?

Remedial steps are not just promises; they are tangible actions you take to resolve OFAC's national security concerns. They have to be concrete and verifiable. Examples include:

• Selling off your ownership in a company involved in sanctioned activities.
• Putting in place a strong, independently audited sanctions compliance program.
• You have terminated all business and personal relationships with other designated parties.
• Publicly denouncing the specific conduct that triggered the sanction.
• Resigning from any influential role within an organization that OFAC views as a problem.

Proposing credible and verifiable remedial steps is often the most persuasive element in convincing OFAC that the reasons for your designation no longer exist.

How Do You File a Petition for Administrative Reconsideration?

A petition for administrative reconsideration must be submitted in writing. It can be filed electronically in two ways.

1. Online portal: Use OFAC's online reconsideration portal. OFAC launched this electronic system in late June 2026 to handle these petitions and their supporting documents.
2. Email: You can submit the complete petition and all evidence by email to OFAC.Reconsideration@treasury.gov.

Whichever method you choose, your submission must be a complete package. When gathering the right evidence for your petition, it is absolutely vital to include every document, declaration, and legal argument that supports your case. An incomplete or poorly documented petition will almost certainly fail.

What Happens After the Petition is Submitted?

Once you file, a long and often opaque review process begins. The procedure is technically governed by 31 CFR § 501.807, but the regulation gives OFAC immense discretion.

• Initial Review: OFAC staff review the petition and all the evidence you submitted.
• Requests for Information (RFIs): The regulation sets no deadline for OFAC's decision; in practice, review can take many months. During this time, OFAC may issue RFIs asking for more information. Responding to these quickly and completely is critical; a slow or incomplete response can stall your case indefinitely.
• Meetings: You can request a meeting with OFAC, but the agency does not have to grant one. Whether to hold one is at OFAC's discretion.
• Written Decision: In the end, OFAC must provide a written decision. It will either grant or deny your delisting request. The decision, together with the rest of the administrative record, is crucial for any future court challenge.

What if there is an insufficient basis for the decision?

If OFAC denies the petition, read the written decision closely for the reasons it gives. Should you believe this denial is itself baseless or "arbitrary and capricious," your primary option is to sue in federal court. The administrative record built during the reconsideration process—your petition, the evidence, the RFIs, and OFAC's denial letter—becomes the foundation for a lawsuit in a U.S. District Court under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). This is why a well-prepared administrative petition is so important: it preserves your ability to have a meaningful day in court.

How Does the OFAC Process Compare to Other Sanctions Regimes?

OFAC's process is uniquely American. Seeing how it stacks up against other major international sanctions regimes provides helpful context.

Key Takeaway: The U.S. OFAC system puts the entire burden on the petitioner to start and push the process forward, offering no fixed deadlines for a decision. By contrast, the EU system has built-in periodic reviews, and for the ISIL/Al-Qaida list the UN has an independent Ombudsperson; other UN lists use the Focal Point for Delisting.

This article is published by an independent law firm for informational purposes only and does not represent or claim affiliation with any government body, international organization, or official authority.

Related reading

Sanction lawyersSanctions delistingSDN list removal

Frequently asked questions

What is a reconsideration request under 31 CFR 501.807?

It is the formal administrative route to ask OFAC to reconsider a designation by submitting arguments and evidence to the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

Who can file an OFAC reconsideration petition?

Do I need a lawyer to file?

How long does OFAC reconsideration take?